Read each measure in its own context.
This profile contains 12 distinct source-backed measures. Compare each figure with its reporting period and geographic scope rather than treating the page as a single safety score or personal-risk estimate.
Crime and safety indicators
Violent crime
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 City Agency/Table 8 violent-crime count. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Property crime
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 City Agency/Table 8 property-crime count. Separate arson is not added to this provider total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Violent crime rate
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Calculated by this site from the direct FBI violent-crime count divided by the population in the same FBI row × 100,000. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Property crime rate
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Calculated by this site from the direct FBI property-crime count divided by the population in the same FBI row × 100,000. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct violent-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Rape
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct violent-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Robbery
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct violent-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Aggravated assault
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct violent-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Burglary
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct property-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Larceny-theft
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct property-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Motor vehicle theft
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 offense-component count; reconciled into the direct property-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
Arson
2025
Geography: FBI 2025 City Agency reporting jurisdiction: Crown Point, IN
Direct FBI 2025 Table 8 arson count when numerically reported. Arson is separate and is not added to the FBI property-crime total. Geography is the FBI city-agency reporting jurisdiction, not an asserted Census municipal boundary.
What these numbers can—and cannot—tell you
Recorded crime depends on reporting practices, police recording systems, geographic boundaries and the period being measured. A lower figure in one category does not establish that every neighborhood, time of day or traveler faces the same risk.
When comparing cities, use like-for-like measures whenever possible. Municipality data should not be directly ranked against metro-area data or a different reporting definition without adjustment.